Wednesday, October 29, 2008
I. Objectivity: Personal neutrality, being detached from subjects (see Ch 3 of the SG). To apply the scientific method w/o personal biases.
Weber - People choose topics according to their belief & interests. (aka value relevant)
I agree, this is why I'm doing Race & Ethnicity for Section C due to my experience growing up in the US and Japan and the last 7 years I spent in South Korea.
Weber warned sociologists to be "Value Free", aka Objective. One way to limit distortion/bias is replication: Repetition of research by other investigators. If the same results are achieved then confidence is gained that the findings/results are accurate (reliable & valid).
Accurate = Reliable + Valid
II. LIMITS, to see the text I'm referring to and a more in-depth explanation, click HERE
1. Human behavior too complex to predict (Perhaps, interpretivism ontology?)
2. Presence of researcher may affect behavior of the subject.
3. Social patterns change, what is true in one time or place may not hold true for another.
4. Being value-free is difficult, because researchers are also part of this world.
III. Interpretive Sociology (aka Interpretivitism, see Ch 3): Basically pioneered by Weber, he believed that researchers should study the meaning that individuals attach to their actions.
Example: When Muslims fast during Ramadahn, the positivists may see it as members of this religion fasting for 30 days every year. Whereas in interpretivitism, we would see that through the fasting, by the physical cleansing through the fast, it is symbolic of the spiritual cleansing. It is also to remember the less fortunate in our society and to serve as a reminder to uphold one of the five pillars of Islam, which is "Charity".
Weber coined the term, "Verstehen" - In German, it literally means understanding, so the interpretive sociologists observes WHAT people do & WHY they do it.
IV. Positivism (discussed in the CH 3 notes) click HERE for more details
V. Critical Sociology - Rejecting the notion that society as a natural system within a fixed order. Focused on the study of society on the need for social/political change. (perhaps Marx, Comte?)
It contradicts Weber's notion of detatchment/objectivity. Critical sociologists want to use their findings to be the voice of those who do not have the power to speak.
Think of it this way:
CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY = ACTIVIST SOCIOLOGY
I hope this will help you remember this better :)
Simply put, they believe that all social research is political or biased, they have no choice in this matter so they can choose which position to support.
Can you think of a moder critical sociological group today?
1. NOW (National Organization for Women)??? Are they Critical sociologists?
3. NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
What do you think? Hope y'all leave a comment and write down your thoughts.
Tomorrow I will post the Research Orientation/Theory/Methods
To hear relevant lectures, click HERE
For 6 misconceptions/assumptions for Chap 2, click HERE
For the causation/correlation example, click HERE
I. Before we can talk about Sociological Research & Methods, we must understand the following question: "What is the sociological perspective?" See Ch 1 for the answer, and for those of you studying along with us, please post your answers in the comments box. Why do I ask this, because there are 2 basics of Sociological Investigation:
1. Apply the sociological perspective (See Chapter 1 of the Main Texts)
2. Be curious & ask questions
a) How does socio-economics affect a child's prospects of an education?
b) Did Moonies become Moonies by choice or via brainwashing?
II. Various "TRUTHS"
1. Saying we "know" something aka belief/faith. (Perhaps supernatural knowledge that Comte refers to?)
2. Truth from "EXPERTS". I hope this is self-explanatory.
3. Simple agreement within society: morals, ethics, what society sees as right & wrong.
4. Scientific "TRUTH": Logical system that bases knowledge on direct, systematic observation dependent on "EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE". Information we can verify with our senses.
Please refer to the 6 common assumptions/misconceptions held by North Americans, please click HERE, a lot of examples of #3 here.
There are accepted as universal "TRUTHS". Remember what momma said, "Believe 1/2 of what you read and none of what you hear."
III. 3 Ways to do Sociology:
1. Scientific: Studying sociology through scientific methods aka "positivism" (see Ch 3 of the SG)
a) Elements of Scientific Sociology:
i) Concept: Simplified, a micro-view of the world; family, race, social class, etc.
ii) Variable: (Think mathematics here), concept whose values change from case to case.
iii) Measurement: Procedure to find the quantitative value of a variable in a specific case.
Related term: Descriptive stats - the "average" for a lot of people.
IV. Defining Concepts: How to measure the abstract? Love, family, intelligence, etc.
A) Operationalizing a variable: Specify exactly what's to be meandered before assigning a value (aka quantifying) to a variable.
Good example: The US presidential election.
1. What percentage of eligible voters will vote?
2. Socio-economics of voters
b) 26 - 32
c) 33 - 40
Hope this makes it a little clearer. We can add males/females, race, educational level, etc.
A) Reliability is a consistency in measurement. Basically if you get the same results after double, triple, quadruple checking you get the same results, it's considered "RELIABLE".
B) Validity is actually measuring exactly what you intend to measure (concept).
Reliability does not always equal validity, such as correlation does not equal causation.
1. The Validity Dilemma: How to get a valid measurement? How do you measure...
a) How religious people are?
b) How close families are?
2. Relationship among variables: Cause & Effect (see Causation Ch 3 in the SG)
3. Correlation: When variables change together. Remember correlation doesn't equal causation
4. Spurrious Correlation: An apparent but false relationship between 2 or more variables that is caused by some other variable. Please click HERE to see a clearer example.
By holding variables constant and by adding other variable, seeing what happens to the results. So, for CAUSE & EFFECT to be established (valid), it must meet the following requirements:
1. Demonstrated Correlation
2. An independent (causal) variable that occur before the dependent variable
3. No evidence that the 3rd variable could be causing a spurrious correlation.
Use the following:
Monday, October 27, 2008
To listen to the streaming audio, push the play button to the left of the title, to download the mp3 file, click the title :)
Globalization and Ethnicity, Part 1
Globalization and Ethnicity, Part 2
Tribalism and the Social Construction of Ethnicity
Friday, October 24, 2008
John Auerbach, PhD from East Tenesee University
To listen to the streaming audio, push the play button to the left of the title, to download the mp3 file, click the title :)
Kimberly Hutchings 14 October 2008
John Sidel 12 March 2008
Stuart Corbridge 6 Feb 2008
by Saul Estrin 30 Jan 2008
Danny Quah 24 Jan 2008
Ron Anderson 17 Jan 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Reading List states, we should read Gidden 5th edition, but the Study Guide refers to the 4th edition.
They told me the appropriate pages will be on the VLE, but the Subject Guide uploaded to the VLE is also referring to the 4th edition, there are even some mistakes in regards to Scott & Fulcher in regards to organization something something, I didn't get the exact name of the book, because it didn't concern me.
Interesting Wikipedia article on Ontology, click HERE
Ontology - It is concerned with WHAT SOCIETIES ARE
Since this is talking about society as a whole, this would be a macro view.
Comte's determinism concept also falls under the ontology umbrella. A better way to understand this, think of the CASTE system. You're born into what you're born into.
Marx & Durkheim viewed societies as social structures. It's the social structures that regulate and shape individual's behavior.
That's where they agree, but the differences are:
Marx - He believed as the actions of the individuals were shaped by the economic structure of the society. (Materialist view)
Weber - Believed the actions of the individuals were shaped by the morals and values of the society put in place. (Idealist view)
In other words, they both believe that the structural organization of society shaped the people within it, they disagreed on how their actions were shaped (materialist vs. idealist)
Also related to empiricism, positivism, realism & post-modernism.
Then there are tow more theories within ontology:
1. Action theorists - Simply put, people shape society not the other way around. They believed that sociologists should study the social actions and the meaning people attach to these actions. (Weber, interpretivitism, or anti-determinism)
Example: Capitalism borne out of the Protestant work ethic and predestination.
2. Structural theorists - (Think Marx & Durkheim) Believes that the organization of society shapes the action of the people.
Now, let talk about Epistemology:
It explores the basis for knowledge - HOW WE KNOW WHAT WE KNOW.
In other words, by using the scientific method, how did you get the results, how do you JUSTIFY your findings?
There are 2 camps in Epistemology:
1. Naturalist - Think of them as positivists, believers in the scientific method (as applied to the natural sciences like chemistry, physics, etc. Thus Naturalist) to justify their findings. They believed results of social science studies can be quantified.
2. Anti Naturalist - Natural sciences can be quantified because of the nature of the science, for example, 2+2 will always = 4. Whereas societies and people are dynamic, so it's not constant. They believed in interpreting the subjectivity of the people they're studying. (Interpretivism - Weber).
Even within epistemology, there are disagreements. What is called the subject(ive) or object(ive) dilemma? There are 3 schools of thoughts on this.
1. Detachment (I hope this is self explanatory)
2. Immersing yourself as closely as possible in the lives of those they are studying (See page 38 of the SG, Video/DVD: The Making of a Moonie, where the author actually lives with and joins the church).
3. You actually have to be a member of the social group being studied, or at least have share the same kind of experiences personally, to provide valid knowledge of their behavior. Simply put, if you never went through it how can you speak with any authority on it?
I myself am a personal believer in steps 2 & 3. For example, how can I know anything about, for example, about Islam unless I go to the mosque, pray, eat Halal food, participate in the Ramadhan, etc.
As for #3, how can a white researcher write about and make theories about Asian people or black people. How can a researcher understand about ex-convicts if he/she's never been in jail or prison?
Sorry that's my 2 cents. It's because if an Asian or black person wrote a sociological research paper on white people, they would give us the same crap. Once again, I"m sorry, this isn't a political pulpit :)
Finally, we talked about Realism:
Realism is similar to positivism in the sense that the scientific methods should be applied, but differs in its interpretation.
Positivists believe all results/findings can be quantified like math, chemistry (natural sciences) and they believed in the causation theory (aka correlation = causation).
Whereas realists believed there are underlying generative mechanisms (fancy way of saying variables to what caused what happened).
Realism is very non-empiricist unlike positivism. All data is theory-dependent. They believed in generating data to test theories against each other (comparing theories).
The main goal of realism is to find the underlying causes of the effect. For example, Comte's causality theory believed
a) Economic recession -> b) Increased unemployment & economic deprivation -> c) increased crime
Whereas in realism, you would look for rival theories and compare the data/findings and the underlying generative mechanisms (increased crime).
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
I want to thank Nor & Laura for meeting me on Skype today, a really productive study session. Thank you, for those of you that also wish to join us please send me a PM at Yansa or leave a comment.
Here's some notes from our session (SG Chapter 3.2 & 3.3) Tomorrow we will discuss 3.1, 3.4 & 4.1
3.2 Postivism: In order to understand positivism. You must know the opposite of positive, which is normative (we'll talk about this later). This concept is associated with Comte. Let's put everything in historical concept. He wasn't too far removed from Frances Bacon creating the scientific method, the French Revolution, heck even the Renaisssance (OK, give or take a few years). Prior to Comte, it was all about the philosophers.
The difference between philosophers & Comte's goals.
Comte wanted to apply scientific methods to how society worked. He wanted to create quantitative data attached to society's actions. A good example is his suicide research findings (read your BOOK). Philosophers on the other hand made normative statements, meaning they discussed and wrote what the ideal society would be. So he wanted Sociology to be accepted like the natural sciences (math, chemistry, physics, etc), then again of course he did, he coined the term :) thus the scientific application of society.
Causality & Determinism:
Causality, Comte assumed that correlation = causation. Although today, we know this not to be true. Which leads us to determinism. Because of his causality ideology he believed that the societal environment or the organization of societies in which people live cause them to think and act in the way they do, irrespective of their free will. (See figure 3.2 in the SG). Religiously speaking this is similar to the Predestination theory that the Presbyterians share, in that whether we become saved or not, it is predestined who will be saved and who will not, which contradicts with free will that they teach. Oh well.
Methodology: Once you have a theory, the questions will be bent more towards getting a quantitative answers.
How Comte & the philosophers were similar:
Despite the fact Comte wanted to make sociology a positive science (positivism), he also shared a normative view as the philosophers did. But Comte believed that he was different from the philosophers because he applied scientific methods to his observations of society. Comte in the end believed that human behavior can be predicted based on his sociological science and through his science he can create a better society.
3.3 Interpretivism: Associated with Weber.aka Interpretative sociology, MEANING is the key word here. What MEANING does the action a person perform mean to that person.
The 3 key differences between POSITIVISM:
#1. Scientific Sociology (Positivism) focuses on action whereas interpretative sociology focuses on the meaning people attach to their actions.
#2. Scientific sociology sees reality as "Out there". Whereas interpretativism sees people creating their own reality in the course of their everyday lives.
#3. Positivism focuses on quantitative data whereas Interpretivism focuses on the qualitative data.
VERSTEHEN - We can't talk about interpretivism w/o talking about VERSTEHEN, which in the German language means "understanding". It's a sociological way of saying "Putting yourself in the other person's shoes."
Methods, We'll discuss later. (Read Chapter 2 of your SG & the required text).
Be careful of RELATIVISM, where one theory or study is seen as just as good as any other.
Hope this was helpful, please feel free to leave a comment or email me.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Sunday, October 19, 2008
If you want to download the mp3, just point your cursor to the lecture you want to download and right click and save target as (IE users) or save link as (for Firefox) and you should be able to download it.
Thank you for your kind comments, I will upload related lectures for sociology HERE
Just point your mouse over the mp3 box and right click and choose save link as (for Firefox) or save target as (for IE users)
Let me know if there are other lectures or videos you're interested in.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Micro credit - A profitable business? click HERE for info or HERE to download
The reason I chose race & ethnicity (over social inequality & social injustice) is because growing up in the US and Japan, even amongst my own people we saw each other differently, even though I always saw ourselves as Korean, and the racism that is so prevalent in the US, even though things changed on the surface level, (laws, census, etc), the xenophobia, the racism, etc didn't go away.
Race & ethnicity: it's self contained in the sense that, there are no related reading materials (cross reference) but if there's not that problem in Trinidad leave it alone!!!!
BUT or HOWEVER, if you want to get ready for next year (BSc Management), the sociology of organizations might be the way to go because its related to the management class 107 Introduction to business and management
Gender - Gender & equality, probably a lot of focus on feminists, role of gender in society, families etc. If there's no ERA women where you're at or perhaps you don't have to fill traditional gender roles (of women of Indian descent) or you don't have a problem filling the gender roles, etc. This is not for you.
Social inequality & social injustice - if you're a first generation immigrant (you came with your parents) this may be the topic for you. Access to educational, economic, legal activities. e.g. if a white Brit or US citizens goes to court will they get less time than a so-called minority (in the US, the answer unfortunately is a staggering yes, don't know about the UK though). Educational opportunities - Do you have access to equally good education as your white counterpart, if you're not white? In the US, people have to go to public schools within their neighborhood (zones) and the more economically disadvantaged the neighborhood, the lower the quality of education. Economic opportunities - promotions, getting that job after graduation, any pay disparities? Very interesting topic but there's so much about Marx, & Weber and sociological theories we have to remember to argue our agreement or disagreements!!!!!!!!!
Religion & Society: Are you Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Buddhist? How do you fit within the parameters of society, globalization, modernity? Gotta become an expert on Section B for this one!!!!Research methods too!!!
Power in society - hope this is self explanatory, Marx, Weber, etc.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Multiculturalism and Secularism
Migration and Social Transformation
The European Union and the Challenge of Globalisation
The Two Faces of Asia: bridging the gap between high growth economies and the poor
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Theory: A statement of how & why specific facts are related.
Page 14: Sociological approach
1. Structural Function approach: It's a framework for building theory whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability in society.
A) Social structure - any relatively stable pattern of social behavior.
B) It also looks for social function, the consequences of any social patterns for the operation of society as a whole (August Comte & Durkheim) <-When writing essays get used to citing people and put it in parenthesis as I did here. Spencer compared society to the human body in that every organism has a role relative to the whole body.
From this we have the following:
A) Manifest Functions: The recognized intended consequences of any social patterns.
B) Latent Functions: The unrecognized and unintended consequences of any social patterns
C) Social dysfunction: Any social pattern that may disrupt the operation of society (street gangs, drug addicts, crime, etc).
2. Social-Conflict approach: A Framework for building theory that sees society as an area of inequality that generates conflict and change -> Look at ongoing conflict between the dominant group and disadvantaged (e.g. The US civil rights movement of the 50's & 60's).
From this we have the following:
A) Feminism & Gender Conflict: Approaches inequality and conflict between men & women in society. Feminism = support of social equality between men & women.
B) Race Conflict: Conflict between different racial & ethnic categories.
3. Symbolic interaction approach: It shares 2 approaches,
A) Macrolevel orientation - broad focus on social structures that shape society.
B) Microlevel orientation - Close up focus on social interaction in specific situations.
*It is a framework for building theory that sees society as a product of everyday interaction of individuals (Max Weber).
Questions, at least these are the questions I have and my thinking, let me know what you think.
1. Let's look at structural functional approach, in the manifest function of trying to define or find sociological data on any particular ethnic group we can learn where crime, terrorism etc arises and possibly the why's. So is the latent function of this racial profiling by people who are not intellectually equipped with the true sociological knowledge that may lead to stereotypes and have a prejudice towards Arab men, or men with Islamic last names especially when terrorism is the new bogeyman for the US? Let me know what you think. My personal experience having grown up in the US, Asian students had the stereotype of being model citizens and students therefore we were racially profiled into that group. Black men are racially profiled by the LAPD so many black men are pulled over by the police based just on their skin color.
2. Feminists say they want equal rights, that being the manifest functions. Could the latent function of fighting for equal rights lead to the goal of wanting to be greater than they are fighting against? These are just some of the questions I have, let's discuss :)
More detailed than the main reading of Macionis: A Global Introduction (more expensive too!!!)
On the 3rd page just answer the essay questions
More detailed than the main reading of Macionis: A Global Introduction (more expensive too!!!)
On the 3rd page just answer the essay questions
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Monday, October 6, 2008
Hey guys here's the SG Chapter 1 activities questions, if you guys want me to send you a copy of the word doc, please email me & I'll be happy to send you a copy of the doc, and let's answer the questions and self critique each other. DON'T PROCRASTINATE, AND LET'S BE BRUTALLY HONEST.
Study Guide, Chapter 1 Activities:
Activity 1.1 A changing world:
Write down five ways that your life is different from that of your mother (if you are female) and your father (if you are male) when they were your age. If you cannot compare yourself with a parent for some reason, then choose another relative or acquaintance 20-30 years older than you.
Activity 1.2 What is sociology?
Before reading any further, let's answer the following questions
- What do you think sociologists study?
- How do you think a sociologist's understanding of some aspect of social life would be different from 'commonsense' understanding?
Activity 1.3 Making the familiar strange. (See page 20)
Activity 1.4 Social & sociological problems – Which of the following do you think are better described as 'social problems' and which do you think are better described as 'sociological problems'?
- Rising divorce rates in your society.
- The role of educational institutions in modern societies.
- How societies change.
- The organization of economic production in your society.
- Illegal drug use.
Activity 1.5 Marx & Weber today: alienation & creativity (see page 25 of the SG).
Do you think either or both of these ideas apply to your society or to your personal experiences? Can you think of some examples that:
- Contradict Marx & Weber's views (Chapter 4, section 4.2)
Activity 1.6 Self & Society: (See page 27 of the SG)
Activity 1.7 Gender differences
Write down 5 differences if you were the opposite sex, out of these differences which do you think are biological or societal.
Activity 1.8 Roles
Write a few brief notes about some of the expectations you think are placed on them (page 28-29)
Activity 1.9 Personal Identity.
- If so, ask yourself why you think you have developed this view of yourself.
- What do you think have been some of the most important influences on the way you see yourself?
- Are there any particular incidents that stand out as being particularly important?
- Also ask yourself how much the social expectations and the reactions of other people influence your behavior.
Activity 1.10 Spoiled identity?
Think about how & why people suddenly react differently to us.
Activity 1.11 A new you?
Did changing yourself work? If so, did you notice people reacting to you differently. Did this affect the way you thought about yourself?
Activity 1.12 Presentation of self.
Do you think Goffman's right? Plus can you think of recent developments in technology that now give people more scope to present different identities?
Activity 1.13 Taking the rold of the other – Daniel's day. (page 34 & 35)
Activity 1.14 Parsons & Mead.
Activity 1.15 (reanswer the Activity 1.2 question)
For Macionis readers (I'm not reading the Global Introductions, I'm reading Sociology 12th edition)
Assignment Guide, Chapter 1
Essay Questions - Turn Into Each Other, let's self critique
Assignment Guide Chapter 6
Essay Questions - Turn into Each Other, let's self critique
Oct 13 & 14
MT Fulcher & Scott Ch 3 or
Giddens (2001) Ch 20 or
Macionis A Global Introduction (2002 & 2005) Ch 3 or
Macionis Sociology 12th edition, Ch 2
SG 2.1 to 2.2 (page 37 to 46)
Discuss Activity 2.1 to 2.4
Oct 16 to 20:
SG 2.3 to 2.5 (ppg 66)
Oct 21 to 22
Discuss Activity 2.5 to 2.12
Oct 23 to 26:
Discuss MT exercises
Oct 27 to 30:
MT: Fulcher & Scott (2003) pp 14 to 17 & 24-25
or Giddens (2001) pp 640-641
Macionis GI (2002) pg 41 to 46 or (2005) 44-69
Macionis 12th edition ppg 631 to 636
Chapter 3, pg 67 to 81
Activity 3.1 to 3.7
Oct 30 & 31
Discuss Activities 3.1 to 3.7
Nov 1 to 3:
Discuss Book activities
Discuss Sociological concepts & ideas, email each other answers to questions from SG etc.
What we should get out of Chapter 1 of the SG
1. How to approach studying sociology
2. What sociology is.
3. The difference between sociology and commonsense.
4. What is meant by Sociological thinking.
5. The relationship between the individual and society.
6. Socialization and identity formation.
1. How to study sociology, what is meant by active learning, and what examiners are looking for.
2. What sociologists study.
3. Some of the key ways that sociology gives us insights that go beyond commonsense understanding.
4. What is meant by thinking sociologically and soiologists' interest in social order, social change and the relationship between the individual and society.
5. How our identities arise from social relationships.
6. What sociologists mean by socialization and identity, and how Parsons and Mead put forward different explanations of these processes.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
CROSS CULTURAL VARIATIONS
Choosing Words with Dignity
Social Construction of Gender
Using Your Values
Humanoid Robotics Group
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
2. Explain the historical roots of sociology in the areas of social change, science, gender, and race.
3. Explain the relationship between sociology and stereotypes.
4. What do different forms of the media teach us about race, class and gender?
5. What do stereotypes tell us about the world we live in? How do sociologists deal with stereotyping?
6. Explain the Thomas theorem and how it relates to the social construction of reality.
7. List and discuss the key points of the dramaturgical view of everyday life and ethnomethodology.
8. Explain the concepts of touching and personal space and how they vary from culture to culture.
9. Describe the importance of social interaction to individuals in our society.
10. Why is it important for international corporations and businesses to understand the way that other cultures interact? Do you think this will become an increased necessity in the future? Why or why not?
11. Why is it important to choose your words carefully when you are interacting socially? What type of an impact does it have when people use terminology or inappropriate words to describe people with different backgrounds? What affect can it have when someone works in a highly visible job in the public eye?
12. How many messages do you hear a day about gender? Are all of the messages you hear the same? What messages do you hear from family members? From friends? From the media? From school teachers? What does this tell us about the social construction of gender through language and social interaction?
13. What do web sites like this tell us about teaching honesty to children? Do you think parents spend less time speaking to professionals face-to-face about advice for parenting now that the Internet is so accessible?
After reading Chapter One, you should be able to:
- Define sociology and examine the components of the sociological perspective.
- Explain the importance of a global perspective for sociology.
- Examine how social marginality and social crisis encourage people to use the sociological perspective.
- Identify and describe four benefits of using the sociological perspective.
- Identify and discuss three social changes especially important to the development of sociology.
- Identify and describe the three-stage historical development of sociology as a science.
- Discuss the importance of theory in sociology.
- Summarize the main assumptions of the three major theoretical approaches in sociology.
- Discuss the application of the three approaches to the sociology of sport.
- Define social interaction and identify its components.
- Distinguish between ascribed and achieved status and describe master status.
- Distinguish between role set, role strain, and role conflict.
- Discuss the extent to which reality is socially constructed.
- Explain the Thomas Theorem.
- State the purposes of ethnomethodological research.
- Outline the characteristics of Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis.
- Discuss the importance of nonverbal communication in human social interaction.
- Examine ways in which gender influences personal performances, including use of language.
- Examine the character of humor.
- Explain the major elements of social interaction by focusing on three dimensions of everyday life: emotions, language, and humor.
Helpful sociological resources here